The Lakers' $53.8 Million Question: To Keep or Trade Austin Reaves?
The Los Angeles Lakers find themselves at a crossroads, facing a decision that could shape their future for years to come. At the heart of this dilemma is Austin Reaves, the undrafted guard who has blossomed into a cornerstone of the team's offense. But here's where it gets controversial: should the Lakers commit to a massive contract extension for Reaves, or should they explore trading him to reshape their roster around Luka Doncic? This question has sparked heated debates among fans and analysts alike, with no clear consensus in sight.
From Undrafted to Unstoppable: Reaves' Rise to Stardom
Austin Reaves' journey from an undrafted rookie to a key player in the Lakers' lineup is nothing short of remarkable. Over the past two seasons, he has transformed into a reliable scorer and playmaker, averaging an impressive 20.2 points, 5.8 assists, and 4.5 rebounds per game during the 2024-25 season. At 27, Reaves is entering his prime, and his value has never been higher. The Lakers previously offered him a four-year, $89 million deal, but Reaves turned it down, seeking a contract that reflects his newfound status as one of the NBA's top shooting guards. Analysts predict his next deal could range from $30 to $40 million annually, a testament to his rapid ascent.
The Lakers' Dilemma: To Re-Sign or Trade?
The Lakers' decision is complicated by several factors. On one hand, re-signing Reaves would solidify him as a core piece alongside Luka Doncic, ensuring roster continuity and maintaining a dynamic backcourt. However, such a move would come at a steep price, potentially limiting the team's financial flexibility under the new CBA. On the other hand, trading Reaves could yield valuable assets, such as draft picks or established players, addressing critical needs like rim protection or frontcourt depth. But this option risks alienating fans and disrupting team chemistry, not to mention the uncertainty of whether the acquired assets will match Reaves' production.
And this is the part most people miss... The Lakers hold the advantage of Reaves' Bird rights, allowing them to offer him more money than any other team if he enters unrestricted free agency. This could be a game-changer in negotiations, but it also raises the stakes. If the Lakers hesitate to commit to a max deal, a sign-and-trade scenario becomes more likely, potentially sending Reaves to a team like Brooklyn in exchange for players like Nic Claxton or other valuable assets.
Winners and Losers: Decoding the Potential Outcomes
- Los Angeles Lakers: Retaining Reaves ensures a proven playmaker and fan favorite remains in the fold, complementing Doncic's skillset. Trading him, however, could address roster gaps and maintain flexibility for future moves.
- Austin Reaves: Staying in Los Angeles offers stability and continuity, while a trade could position him as a featured star elsewhere, likely with a massive payday.
- Potential Trade Partners: Any team acquiring Reaves would gain a 27-year-old in his prime, with playoff experience and leadership qualities, making him an attractive asset for franchises aiming for both competitiveness and long-term development.
The Case for Keeping vs. Trading Reaves
Keeping Reaves:
- Pros: Elite secondary scoring, reliable playmaking, and a deep connection with Lakers fans.
- Cons: A massive contract could restrict financial flexibility, and his defense remains a question mark.
Trading Reaves:
- Pros: Potential to acquire defensive or frontcourt help, reduce luxury tax pressure, and prevent overpaying.
- Cons: Losing a homegrown star, disrupting chemistry, and the risk of acquired assets underperforming.
Final Thoughts: A Balancing Act
Re-signing Austin Reaves at around $30–35 million annually seems like the most balanced approach, retaining a consistent performer while preserving future flexibility. However, if a blockbuster trade opportunity arises, the Lakers might be tempted to make a bold move. Ultimately, Reaves' situation is one of the most compelling storylines heading into the 2026 offseason, with the potential to define the next era of Lakers basketball. But here's the real question: Is the Lakers' future brighter with Reaves as a cornerstone, or would trading him for a game-changing asset be the smarter play? Weigh in with your thoughts in the comments – this debate is far from over!
